US - Mexico & Hispanic Issues

Immigration and Security

Opinion: Dream On

By Marisa TreviƱo, MATT Contributing Writer 
Wednesday, August 22, 2007 


Utter the word “surge” these days and people will think you’re talking about the military buildup of troops in Iraq, but for a special group of young people the term is an acronym for what they want to do with their lives — Students United to Reach Goals in Education.

Students who belong to SURGE aren’t just the typical all-American kids dreaming of a college education.

In fact, they’re not even U.S. citizens.

SURGE members comprise part of the 65,000 students who graduate from U.S. high schools each year who are undocumented immigrants. Brought into this country by their parents when they were younger, sometimes even as infants, the students have grown up with their belief system shaped by the principles of American democracy.

For all practical purposes, these children are U.S. Americans.

For some, the logical step is to continue with their education after high school. For all of them, it’s time to swear a citizenship oath, publicly confirming what they feel in their hearts.

But it’s not that easy for an undocumented student.

That’s why those who belong to SURGE or R.I.S.E. (Rising Immigrant Scholars through Education) or IDEAS (Improving Dreams, Equality, Access & Success) or any one of the increasing number of organizations being created on college campuses across the country focused on undocumented students’ quest for citizenship are praying that Congress passes the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors, otherwise known as the DREAM Act.

The DREAM Act carries all the provisions that would make these students’ future secure and successful: in-state prices for college tuition, eligibility for state and federal grants and scholarships and the ability to legally hold down a job while going to school.

No one has a problem with that portion of the bill but it’s the other part that stipulates that those students who don’t go to school must enter the military for two years in order to qualify for citizenship that has some fuming.

It’s no secret that it is expressly the military provision in the DREAM Act that makes it so attractive to politicians who otherwise think it is just another attempt at rewarding amnesty to undocumented immigrants.

In its current form, the DREAM Act is slated to be added as an amendment to the Department of Defense Authorization bill. Initial analysis shows that the DREAM Act has a very good shot at passing.

And why not? The Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank, estimates that if the DREAM Act were passed, it would make 279,000 people immediately eligible for college enrollment or military service. For those undocumented children who are currently between the ages of 5 and 17, the potential exists to add another 715,000 eligible young people for future enrollment or military service.

Chances are, if current trends remain the same, there will be many more young Latinos serving in the military than going off to college.

For example, out of a current population of 44.3 million Hispanics, as reported by the U.S. Census, only 3.1 million Latinos, ages 18 and older, have their bachelor’s degrees.

With an educational system that has been historically deficient in meeting the learning needs of Latino students, some critics of the mandatory either-or citizenship requirement see it as an underhanded way to bulk up military forces without enacting an official draft.

Combine that with the results of a 2004 Rand Corporation survey that found 45 percent of Hispanic boys and 31 percent of Hispanic girls between the ages of 16 and 21 saying they would be “very likely” to serve on active duty in the next few years, compared to only 24 percent of white males and 10 percent for white females, and it’s not hard to project that the military may very well meet their recruiting goals after a couple of years of falling short of those objectives.

If ever there was an example of that proverbial saying “between a rock and a hard place,” this is it, especially since Hispanics comprise the second highest number of deaths in the Iraqi war.

But if there is a silver lining to the military requirement, it’s that the threat of serving in a war zone may be enough of an incentive for some young Latinos to stay in school — and create a whole new surge of educated Latinos who can impact the future quality of education for Latino students, as well as, the direction of this country.

Trevino’s opinion pieces appear frequently on MATT.org. The opinions are her own.



 
   
Comments

bettybb 27 August, 2007 11:08:26

I can understand your ire over the military recruiting and the military provisions in the Dream Act. Frankly, the military is not a choice I would advise anyone to make.

But there is a certain logic to the offer of citizenship. Most Americans would probably say anyone who is willing to put their life on the line for America deserves citizenship.Without a doubt the citizenshi is earned.

The real problem Americans have with the Dream Act is the other provision. The one where money is taken away from low income American college kids and given to illegals. That is never going to fly. And really, why should it? Illegals have no claim on the USA taxpayer who should take care of its citizens. I doubt very much that Mexico would take money away from its students and give them to say illegal Americans living there.

As it is, the American taxpayer has probably susidizied the illegal and his family to the tune of $30,000 per year per person, has provided free grade school and high school education, free meals and free health care to the illegal. Every post I have seen by Americans on the subject say enough is enough.

Plus there is an additiona problem. The Dream Act also provides citizenship. Why? Who knows. It is not earned. Why should illegals who have already benefited mightly from the USA get citizenship before those who are coming in legally and waiting their turn?

The rule of law is the basis our our demcracy. It is apparant from recent comments by Hispanic illegals in America that they have not a clue what this means or why it is important. It means one rule of law for everyone applied equally. So when a law is passesd by our governement setting immigration procedure, everyone must follow that procedure, and the rules set up get applied in the same way for people coming in from Europe, Asia, Africa, India, and every country on the globe.

Hispanics are demanding they be able to cut in line. It is not only morally wrong, ethically wrong, it is legally wrong. Most failed third world countries, with corrupt non responsive to the people governments,ignore the rule of law.

Plus if these illegal students are given citizeship, they will bring in their family members by the boat load. It is a back door to amnesty which the American people by 75% are against.

It is not only that the illegals are criminals who have broken multiple laws, it is question of cost. If the USA gets 12 million new immigrants, in 20 years there will be a bill for 2.5 trillion dollars in unfunded entitlemetns for those immigrants alone. There is no way the American taxpayer can assume these costs without paying four times the amount of taxes he is paying now.

So if the Dream Act goes through, it will probably only be the military provision.

But what would be nice is for the illegal students, to have a parade, flying American flags only, in gratitute and thanks for all the American taxpayer has done for them over the years. And then they return to their home countries where hopefully they will make a difference.


usmcwife 26 September, 2007 06:09:26
In any system, resources are limited. It is unjust and incomprehensible to extend benefits in a limited resource to those who are least deserving.

NO to the DREAM act. I have no doubt that many of these students are bright and hardworking -- which is why they should return to their parents home countries and receive their college education there. Then they can help build a more just and economically equitable society. Letting them stay here does not help change the dynamics of poverty and an entrenched privilege for a few.

Returning these bright, motivated and hard working kids to earn their degrees in their home countries is the best resource we could give the host countries.

I believe in changing the dynamics of inequality and creating just societies, I do not believe in rewarding those who defy immigration laws for their own economic benefit.


usmcwife 26 September, 2007 06:09:04
The military service provision is a slap in the face to the military. It is another classic case of the Democrats thinking that military service is nothing more than a dumping ground.

Today's military is volunteer, motivated and highly technically skilled. It would take more than two years for any potential recruit to repay the military for the time and cost to recruit, acclimate to military culture and train.

Adding in the "military" provision is nothing more than pandering and is a slap in the face to today's professional military.


more
More onImmigration and Security
editorial
college graduation or military service 
 
Search:   Matt   The Web