Thursday, December 06, 2007
...and we're back!
Sorry about the temporary absence. Some tech glitches had us bogged down but now we're back to our regular daily posting schedule. Anything we may have missed since last Friday that we don't post today, make sure to send our way. E-mail to daniela [at] matt.org.

Posted By Daniela  at 02:36 AM




Thursday, December 06, 2007
Cartoon of the day


By Ted Rall, Universal Press Syndicate.

Posted By Daniela  at 02:38 AM




Thursday, December 06, 2007
Brazilian immigrants head back home in droves
The Brazilian government estimates that 1.1 million of its citizens live in the United States—a number much lower than the official figure estimated by the U.S. govenrment.

The New York Times wrote an article about the huge numbers of Brazilian immigrants who have returned to their home country this year, many citing financial woes tied to the overall economic slump.

In fact, there are more Brazilians leaving than there are arriving to the United States—a reverse of an upward curve over recent years.

Posted By Daniela  at 02:53 AM




Thursday, December 06, 2007
Hate crimes against Latinos up

Posted By Daniela  at 02:59 AM




Thursday, December 06, 2007
Dems also hone in on immigration
On Friday, we told you that the last GOP presidential debate involved a lot of talk on immigration issues; their Democratic counterparts honed in on immigration as well Tuesday during the NPR debate (one of the more substantial debates we’ve heard this election season).

The big question put to the White House hopefuls was whether or not regular citizens should turn in undocumented immigrants to authorities.

Here’s a partial recap:
After Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton said she did not think that civilians should be “enforcing the broken laws of our federal immigration system,” Steve Inskeep of NPR asked her, “If a citizen witnessed some other kind of crime, wouldn’t you want them to report it?”

“It’s a very clever question, Steve,” Mrs. Clinton replied, “but I think it really begs the question. What we’re looking at here is 12 to 14 million people — they live in our neighborhoods, they take care of our elderly, they probably made the beds in the hotels that some of us stayed in last night. They are embedded in our society. If we want to listen to the demagogues and the calls for us to begin to try to round up people and turn every American into a suspicious vigilante, I think we will do graver harm to the fabric of our nation than any kind of person-by-person reporting of someone who might be here illegally.”

Senator Barack Obama responded to the question by saying that “we are not going to deputize a whole bunch of American citizens to start grabbing people or turning them in.”

Representative Dennis J. Kucinich said, “We don’t encourage vigilantism in this country.”

Posted By Daniela  at 03:07 AM




Thursday, December 06, 2007
Reader Op/Ed: Population growth and energy
The next in a series of reader op/eds, this one is about population growth and its connection to energy.

(If you would like to submit an editorial on an immigration-related issue, please send ~500 words to daniela [at] matt.org.)

Eminent demographer Joel Cohen’s important book entitled “How Many People Can the Earth Support?” sheds light on the problem of world population growth and by extrapolation on our own corner of planet earth. Cohen writes, “… I will not try to persuade you that the world will end in the next ten years unless everybody changes to a diet of soybeans and contraceptive pills, or that a universal diet of soybeans and contraceptive pills would eliminate hunger, disease, violence, ignorance and poverty…. But I will try to persuade you that the world cannot easily and comfortably accommodate an unlimited number of people at any desirable level of material, mental and civic well-being.” Similarly, I will not try to convince you that the United States cannot support any more people but I will try to convince you that unfettered population growth is self-defeating and in the long run will compromise our standard of living and quality of life.

We all know that natural resources are finite.  It follows that if one divides finite natural resources by an ever- increasing population, the inevitable result is less for everyone.  Petroleum is one such natural resource.  Hubbert’s Law predicts that once you extract half the oil from a given field, production begins to decline.  In spite of improvements in extraction techniques and efficiencies, that law proved to be astonishingly accurate in the case of U.S. oil fields. Except for a temporary small increase when the Alaskan North Slope oil began to flow, U.S. petroleum production has been in decline since 1971.  Over the first 32 years since reaching that peak, U.S. production has declined by more than 41%.  World production per capita has also peaked.  In a complex, petroleum-dependent society like ours, this is one of the defining problems of this century.  It can be addressed through the vigorous development of new energy sources, energy conservation and population stabilization.

According to the Census Bureau, our population is projected to grow from 275 million in 2000 to 404 million by 2050 and 571 million by 2100.  The fertility rate of American women is about 2.03, just enough to replace our population.  Therefore, all of the projected population growth to 2050 and beyond is attributable entirely to visas, legal immigrants, illegal aliens and their progeny.  Women of Mexican origin have nearly twice as many children as non-Hispanic white women. Roughly half of the growth between now and mid-century will be due to the Hispanics already here and those flooding through our porous borders.  They like to make babies but do not seem to comprehend that this will ultimately re-create the very conditions they left their homelands to escape – poverty, joblessness, crime, and disease.  It will ultimately condemn their children and their childrens’ children to a life not unlike the life their ancestors lived in Mexico and perhaps a government as corrupt as the Mexican government.

The message is clear:   curb population growth or face a future of diminishing returns, a lower standard of living, and a compromised quality of life.

The author, who you know as commenter "Ultima", has 40 years experience in federal and state government. He holds M.S.P.A., M.B.A., and C.P.A degrees. He previously wrote op/eds for us on Nov. 26: Reader Op/Ed: Illegal immigration and future water wars and Nov. 9: Reader Op/Ed: Who are the ’pro-legals’?

Posted By Daniela  at 03:12 AM




Remember how last week it was reported that the Bush administration was dropping the "no-match crackdown" appeal until next spring, when a revised version would be introduced?

If not, read that post: White House suspends legal defense of ’no-match letters’ rule

Well, now the Los Angeles Times reports that the White House is instead readying itself to appeal the injunction of the "no-match crackdown", which targets employers who don’t fire employees whose Social Security numbers don’t match the ones on file at the Social Security Administration.

In addition to announcing their plan to appeal the federal judge’s ruling, the White House announced plans to issue new rules that would make it easier to attract farmworker immigrants as well as adding more federal agents at the U.S.-Mexico border.

Posted By Daniela  at 03:21 AM




Friday, December 07, 2007
Cartoon of the day


By August J. Pollak, Huffington Post.com.

Posted By Daniela  at 12:42 AM




Friday, December 07, 2007
Nicaraguans find "USA in Costa Rica"
Here's an interesting take at immigration. Reuters news-wire reports that many Nicaraguans are moving to Costa Rica in search of what many come to the U.S. for: jobs, and, yes, the "American dream."

It appears that Costa Rica's economy is booming, and since many of Costa Ricans are highly educated and settled in the middle class, there are many service jobs they don't want to fill. That's where immigrants like the Nicaraguans come in.

The Costa Rican economy is embracing the inflow of immigrants; the country's immigration chief says he expects Costa Rica "needs" 40,000 Nicaraguans to come as soon as possible.

Costa Rica's economy grew at six percent this fiscal year for the third year in a row.

(Thanks to Mary for the tip.)

Posted By Daniela  at 01:54 AM





Posted By Daniela  at 01:54 AM